317.745.4494
Call to Schedule an Appointment

Arrington Law Help Center

How Indiana Courts Handle Contested Child Support Or

Child support is often one of the most contested issues in Indiana family law. Even when parents agree on custody or parenting time, disputes often arise over what the monthly child support amount should be, especially when income is inconsistent, expenses are disputed, or one parent believes the court used the wrong numbers. In the...

What Indiana Parents Should Know About Child Relocation Disputes

If a parent wants to relocate after a divorce or custody decision, this decision can have far more consequences than those faced by the relocating parent. In the State of Indiana, relocation with a child can impact visitation rights, the child’s continuity in school, and the child’s relationship with both parents. This is why in...

Unequal Division of Property in Indiana Divorce Cases

A lot of folks going through a divorce assume that Indiana law requires judges to split the marital estate 50/50. That isn’t so. In some cases, judges can see fit to award more of the marital estate to one party than the other. While Indiana does start with the presumption that the marital estate should...

Unequal Division of Marital Property in Indiana

One commonly held belief is that marital property is always divided in half during divorce. It is true that Indiana law starts with the presumption that it should be divided 50/50, but the court can see fit to award more of the marital estate to one party over the other.  Background of the case In...

Bizik v. Bizik: Indiana Court Clarifies Limits on Contested Alimony Awards

In Indiana, spousal maintenance, often referred to as alimony, is much more limited than in other states. While some places allow long-term or even permanent support after divorce, Indiana law only permits maintenance in very specific situations set out by statute.  The case of Bizik v. Bizik is still one of the most well-known examples...

Indiana Court Reverses Custody Modification in Palma v. Keown

Custody disputes can become especially tense when one parent wants to change an arrangement that is already in place—especially if things have been working, at least on the surface. Even when joint custody seems fine on paper, real-life challenges can cause one parent to push for a change. In the case of Palma v. Keown...

Indiana Court Upholds Contested Agreement in Harrill v. Harrill

Prenuptial agreements can become a major source of conflict during a divorce—especially if one spouse later feels the agreement was unfair or wasn’t handled properly when it was signed. In the case of Harill v. Harill, the Indiana Court of Appeals took another look at these kinds of disputes. The court reaffirmed the rules Indiana...

Thompson v. Wolfram: Indiana Clarifies How Prenups Treat Asset Appreciation

In Thompson v. Wolfram, the Indiana Court of Appeals addressed a common source of conflict in dissolutions involving prenuptial agreements: what happens to the appreciation of separate property during the marriage? This case provides important guidance for those in family court, underscoring that the precise wording of a prenup controls the outcome.  Background of the...

Matzat v. Matzat: Indiana Clarifies the Evidence Required for Spousal Maintenance

In Matzat v. Matzat, the Indiana Court of Appeals addressed a highly contested issue: when can a spouse receive incapacity-based spousal maintenance, and what evidentiary showing is required? The decision is still widely cited because it draws a clear line between permissible judicial discretion and the necessity of objective proof. For attorneys handling maintenance claims,...

1 2 3 63